Also question is, what was wrong with the Second National Bank?
Although foreign ownership was not a problem (foreigners owned about 20% of the Bank's stock), the Second Bank was plagued with poor management and outright fraud (Galbraith). It also quickly alienated state banks by returning to the sudden banknote redemption practices of the First Bank.
Similarly, why was the second National Bank unconstitutional? Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill re-chartering the Second Bank in July 1832 by arguing that in the form presented to him it was incompatible with “justice,†“sound policy†and the Constitution.
Subsequently, one may also ask, why was the National Bank so controversial?
Democratic-Republican leaders felt that Hamilton's bank would have too much power, and would cause a banking monopoly. Jefferson and his political allies held that the bank was unconstitutional (illegal under the Constitution), since the Constitution did not specifically give the government power to charter banks.
What were the arguments for the Second Bank of the United States?
The essential function of the bank was to regulate the public credit issued by private banking institutions through the fiscal duties it performed for the U.S. Treasury, and to establish a sound and stable national currency.