If a RAID 6 array contains the minimum number of disks -- four -- then it can only hold half the total disk capacity in data, as well, because RAID 6 reserves the capacity amount of two drives to hold parity. The difference comes as you add disks.
Likewise, people ask, why is RAID 6 the best?
In general, RAID 6 offers greater data protection and fault tolerance than RAID 5, but at the same time, it's write performance is slower than RAID 5 because of double parity, though the read operations are equally fast. RAID 5, on the other hand, is cheaper to implement and provides more optimized storage than RAID 6.
Also Know, why is RAID 6 bad? RAID 6 RAID 6 tackles this problem by creating enough parity data to handle 2 failures. You can lose a disk and have a URE and still reconstruct your data. Some complain about the increased overhead of 2 parity disks. But doubling the size of RAID 5 stripe gives you dual disk protection with the same capacity.
Also question is, what are the advantages of RAID 6?
Benefits of RAID 6 protection
- Lost data is automatically reconstructed by the IOA after a disk failure.
- The system continues to run after two disks fail.
- Two failed disk units can be replaced without stopping the system.
- Two disk units of capacity are dedicated to storing parity data in a parity set.
Why is RAID 10 better than 6?
RAID 10 is faster to rebuild
The major weakness of RAID 6 is that it takes a long time to rebuild the array after a disk failure because of RAID 6's slow write times. With even a moderate-sized array, rebuild times can stretch to 24 hours, depending on how many disks are in the array and the capacity of the disks.